| Fritz Springmeier describes the pyramid system of gnostic control
|
http://www.coffinman.co.uk/deprogramming_complex.htm
The deprogramming complex
Showing posts with label Floum Orwellian truthling gatekeeper spook coffinman. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Floum Orwellian truthling gatekeeper spook coffinman. Show all posts
Wednesday, 28 March 2007
Fritz Springmeier describes the pyramid system of gnostic control
http://www.coffinman.co.uk/deprogramming_complex.htm
The deprogramming complex
Tuesday, 6 March 2007
Letters to Jim Fetzer
Hello Jim
This is important, Jim
To Jim Fetzer
Planehugger Fetzer re-affirms his statement "The truth may not be what we want"
Coffinman special release for Jimbob
Friday, 2 March 2007
Coffinman confronts Steven Jones on the tower destructions
Coffinman confronts Steven Jones on the tower destructions
I phoned into Tarpley's show to confront him about the claims he made regarding the unavailability on Earth of the power needed to destroy the towers by directed energy methods.
Greg Jenkins has produced a document in which he claims that it would take five times the power produced on Earth.
Tarpley immediately tries to pressure me by saying "quickly!" in a domineering tone, this is a technique used to cause a person to immediately strip their question down without due consideration and therefore weaken it.
The point I made to Jones was that this figure completely ignored any secret military power sources.
Notice that Jones will not speak for himself, he says that he is citing the work of Greg Jenkins.
At one point he says that "there's only four forces in nature".
If anyone knows what that means email me or write it in the forum.
My mic. was muted at that time.
Then I mentioned cold fusion, we know already that Professor Jones was instrumental in killing the development of this World-saving capability.
When I ask "Didn't you prematurely release a paper that prevented Fleischmann and Pons from patenting their work?" my mike was muted before I got the question out.
After that happens, listen to the way Jones says "power-wise, you see?" It sounds like that is when he signals Tarpley to put my mic. back on line.
Then I ask him about the spire, and my mic. is cut for good immediately after my question.
While Tarpley cuts my mic, he tells me to "Let Professor Jones answer", as if to imply that my mic. is still live, and then when Jones directs a question at me (have I read Jenkins' paper?) Tarpley says "Damien is no longer with us" as if I hung up or something.
They worked together to contain my questions.
So we have yet another instance of Jones evading my questions.
The first time he hid under a rock, this time he hid behind an accomplice with a finger on the mute button to my mic.
I phoned into Tarpley's show to confront him about the claims he made regarding the unavailability on Earth of the power needed to destroy the towers by directed energy methods.
Greg Jenkins has produced a document in which he claims that it would take five times the power produced on Earth.
Tarpley immediately tries to pressure me by saying "quickly!" in a domineering tone, this is a technique used to cause a person to immediately strip their question down without due consideration and therefore weaken it.
The point I made to Jones was that this figure completely ignored any secret military power sources.
Notice that Jones will not speak for himself, he says that he is citing the work of Greg Jenkins.
At one point he says that "there's only four forces in nature".
If anyone knows what that means email me or write it in the forum.
My mic. was muted at that time.
Then I mentioned cold fusion, we know already that Professor Jones was instrumental in killing the development of this World-saving capability.
When I ask "Didn't you prematurely release a paper that prevented Fleischmann and Pons from patenting their work?" my mike was muted before I got the question out.
After that happens, listen to the way Jones says "power-wise, you see?" It sounds like that is when he signals Tarpley to put my mic. back on line.
Then I ask him about the spire, and my mic. is cut for good immediately after my question.
While Tarpley cuts my mic, he tells me to "Let Professor Jones answer", as if to imply that my mic. is still live, and then when Jones directs a question at me (have I read Jenkins' paper?) Tarpley says "Damien is no longer with us" as if I hung up or something.
They worked together to contain my questions.
So we have yet another instance of Jones evading my questions.
The first time he hid under a rock, this time he hid behind an accomplice with a finger on the mute button to my mic.
Sunday, 18 February 2007
Friday, 29 December 2006
Alex Floum admits to gatekeeping
Here is someone acknowledging that they are being a gatekeeper. Alex
Floum is stating he is censoring the truth movement for his personal
needs. Is that science or politics?
Is this why got 911blogger to censor the truth?
Is this why he is destroying the truth movement?
>From: "Attorney@email.com"
>To: jfetzer@d.umn.edu, "Fred Burks"
> "Thomas J. Mattingly"
> "Morgan Reynolds"
> "Rick Siegel"
> davraygrif@cox.net
>Cc: CMXarts@aol.com, hardevidence@gmail.com, attorney@email.com,
> ShawnDavies@ahrfoundation.com, sdtaulbee@hotmail.com, vic@sfsu.edu,
> newtonnjd@yahoo.com, KenJenkins@aol.com,
> "Chris Poate"
> "KEVIN RYAN"
> Jsleaphart@cs.com, khidria@merr.com
>Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 14:23:15 -0500
>Subject: Directed Energy Weapons
>
>
>Friends,
>
> I have received many emails recently, many of them threatening me
>physically, defaming me, or otherwise not very helpful, saying that
>I'm a bad guy because I am a "gatekeeper" against the theory that
>directed energy weapons brought down the world trade center.
>
> You should know that those who have attacked me have delayed by
>months or years my openness to considering those theories. When I
>am being threatened by state bar complaints, lawsuits, physical
>attacks, defamation all over the web, and power-struggles within a
>group I helped founded, sorry but I am just not going to very open
>to thoughtfully considering what those who have been attacking me
>are saying.
>
> That isn't very surprising, is it?
>
>Alex.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
