War against whom?

War against whom?

I heard a comment today that puts the major problems of the World into the correct perspective.
That comment was that the revealing of an all-encompassing data collection network by Edward Snowdon was an "act of war against the United States of America".
People are treating this concept as controversial or contradictory, while it is neither.
The confusion arises because of a deception of words which was carried out:
The United States of America (USA or U.S.A.), commonly called the United States (US or U.S.) and America, is a federal republic consisting of fifty states and a federal district.
Looking at the constitution on which the republic was founded, many people believe that the revelations made by Snowdon were made in the spirit of protecting the United States of America from those wishing to subvert it.

However:

The Act of 1871 formed a corporation called THE UNITED STATES. The corporation, OWNED by foreign interests, moved in and shoved the original Constitution into a dustbin. With the Act of 1871, the organic Constitution was defaced -- in effect vandalized and sabotage -- when the title was capitalized and the word "for" was changed to "of" in the title.
This is explained here:
http://theunjustmedia.com/Banking%20&%20Federal%20Reserve/The%20united%20states%20Of%20America%20%20is%20a%20corporation%20owned%20by%20fore.htm

SO THERE EXISTS TWO SEPARATE, DIAMETRICALLY-OPPOSED ENTITIES THAT SEEM TO HAVE THE SAME NAME.

1. The United States (N.B NOT all caps), which is a FEDERAL REPUBLIC.

2. THE UNITED STATES (N.B. all caps), which is a CORPORATION that displaced the positions of power of the federal republic without full diclosure and has been masquerading as the government of a federal republic ever since, whilst acting as a corporation.

Once this is understood, many apparent contradictions start to make sense, including the one about Snowden.

Edward Snowden's actions were in protection of the constitution of The United States of America and in line with the common outlook expressed by the founding fathers of the American republic, who warned against the subversion of political power and the loss of freedom.

Snowden's actions were also an act of war against THE UNITED STATES corporation,which has subverted political power and is in the process of destroying all freedom. It seems that a quote from Karl Marx makes a perfect motto for THE UNITED STATES corporation:
"The meaning of peace is the absence of opposition to socialism"
Where socialism means the complete control of the state over all aspects of everything, including lifespan, reproduction and even genetic makeup or transhuman design. This final evolution of the plan of the psychopaths has been described in detail by Aldous Huxley (who, showing extreme mental illness described such a situation as "what rulers would naturally want to evolve to").

The imposition of Admiralty Law (notified by the gold fringe you see around your flag) on land has been fraudulent from the beginning, using subterfuge and de facto trickery in order to get free men to act as vessels operating in commerce. Such use of Admiralty Law on land is an insult to Common Law.

If America is to be a federal republic, then it should have a government OF THE PEOPLE under Common Law according to the constitution as originally drafted, and a full public enquiry into how the corporate takeover happened and what amendments to the constitution played what part in the process.

If America is to be a corporatocracy (as it has been acting for decades anyway) then people should stop trying to expose aspects of it that are not in line with the republican model and its Common Law freedoms.

You couldn't describe something generally as an act of war against Korea for instance, when we know there are two opposing sides. Likewise the term USA is intentionally and deceptively vague.

People should differentiate between "The United States of America republic" and "THE UNITED STATES corporation" and describe each fully each time they are mentioned, and avoid any unnecessary confusion.
We just need to CALL THINGS BY THEIR PROPER NAME!

Evil is a lie- The nature of psychopaths

Somebody said:
"religious ideology is WHAT caused 9/11 (either the official story or the alternate one)".

Well I would say yes and no.

Consider this outlook:

There IS a group that seeks to control the World. This is explained below.

This group created all of the organized religions in order to establish and further their control. These religions are actually cults.

This group also created their own religion (cult), incorporating into it rituals, symbols and very real "esoteric" knowledge from great civilisations that had preceeded them. THE KNOWLEDGE INCLUDED A THOROUGH UNDERSTANDING OF HUMAN BEHAVIOUR and this was essential in order that such control mechanisms (the cults) could be created and used to manipulate social history.

The cult of this group and it's rituals provides the members of this group with a belief system that is used to rationalise their collective action. Any aspects of their knowledge that may be described as both spiritual and real is simply higher understanding and the claimed connection of it to their alleged religion is a lie. As is their religion itself.

Their religion is a lie used to hide the most terrible mental illness of all. (All of these cults are a reflection of the mental illness that created them.).

They talk of "duality", and through the "Old Testament" (which is only a false history of a fictitious destructive god and the fictitious conquests of the destructive "chosen people", therefore making destruction "godly") they tell us that there is a battle in "Heaven" between "good and evil" and that this must be reflected on Earth, and so that is why "evil" must exist on Earth and in all of our lives.

The concept of "Evil" itself is a lie that is used to hide the mental illness that would rather see things destroyed than be unable to control them.

This illness has been understood in a little-known science that was developed under conditions of state terror.

The scientists themselves had delusions (I won't go into here) that the intent of the invention of Communism was good, but they saw that Communism had brought about conditions of terror. Fuelled by the delusions of Communism having been a Humanitarian concept, they set out to find out WHY EVIL ALWAYS DEVELOPS AT THE TOP OF A SOCIAL STRUCTURE. Their findings explain why Human social history has been the way it has, and what drives it.

Their findings also show us how to end the greatest spoiler of what should have been a beautiful Human social history once and for all.
The answer they found is an extremely common mental illness, which is NEVER DISCUSSED OR MENTIONED by any part of their system, because they never want you to understand these concepts:

Psychopathy.

A psychopath is not some raging lunatic.

A psychopath is a person who has NO EMPATHY. it's that simple.

Empathy is the scale for the Golden rule: Do unto others as you would have done to yourself.

The Golden rule is ESSENTIAL for harmonious social interaction.

Psychopathy is a very real condition, and the study found that 1 IN 6 PEOPLE ARE PSYCHOPATHS.

Psychopaths can recognise other psychopaths readily in crowds, and they tend to congregate and get on with each other straightaway.

NOW HERE'S THE IMPORTANT BIT:

The most profound effect of a lack of empathy is that it makes a person averse to controlling their own behaviour on account of being in a social environment. Some psychopaths are able to deal with this and integrate with normal people while others will openly display a disregard for others which may or may not include violence, but when this aversion is severe and the individual is intelligent and capable the person will strive to achieve a position of control, and will normally be successful because people that are not psychopathic will never fight as hard or as dirty for such positions. Once in a control position, psychopaths then place other psychopaths in subordinate roles. In this way they protect themselves collectively from having to feel "controlled" by behaviour protocols based on empathy.

For some, only ABSOLUTE CONTROL OF EVERYTHING can ever be enough, and they would rather see everything destroyed than be unable to have such control. Such people suffer from the most extreme form of psychopathy, and it is indeed the most terrible mental illness of all, and all of the woes of Human social history can be blamed on this illness, up to and including the current supposedly final part of their plan to cull the World's population drastically and have microchipped people living in restricted environments, and only a poisoned Earth outside.

There are different things that can cause psychopathy:

Inherited genetical condition.

Severe trauma, especially when young. Ritual circumcisions, modern birth practices and early vaccinations are all harmful in this respect.

Acquired mental behaviour (from peer group, family or social group). Acquired mental behaviour can be reinforced if the individual is aware of being in a position where the social group has strong blackmail controls over them, which is the purpose of many wrongful things that these individuals do either in ritual or in the established lifestyle of the social group. Secret societies operate in this way as do gangs of thugs. Kay Griggs explains that this is how the US military top brass are controlled too:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03nwLOHt2wQ

THE MOST FUNDAMENTAL AND IMPORTANT ISSUE OF ALL TIME:
POLITICAL PONEROLOGY
If it could be achieved across the board in the advanced countries that psychopathy was recognised and tested for, and that no psychopath be allowed to hold any position of power or authority, then we would have a World that we could love.
POLITICAL PONEROLOGY is the SCIENCE that has allowed us to understand why psycopaths are driven to achieve positions of power, and why for some no amount of control is ever enough for them:
http://ponerology.com/

The suppression of truth on the David Icke forum

I recently used David Icke's forum to post a few important articles and I quickly found that there is a strict immediate censorship of certain materials and that no discussion is allowed of how these principles are applied to the truth.

Be aware that the post I made which caused this to become apparent was extremely shocking and disturbing, but I do not believe that it was "discriminatory".

I posted a link to an analysis of the video "Beat it" by Michael Jackson. The depravity of those who control the direction of popular thinking is laid bare for all to see in this video analysis It is indeed deeply disturbing to know that we are being programmed by these methods from childhood.

YOU CAN WATCH THE ANALYSIS HERE:

http://lenonhonorfilms.com/WhatLiesInPlainSight.html

Here is the warning I received at the forum:


XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Dear damienduffy,

You have received an infraction at David Icke's Official Forums.

Reason: Discussing Moderation on the Forum - First Notice
-------
Hi there, discussing moderation and/ or making threads or posts about it is against the guidelines of the forum, please read these, thanks.
-------

This infraction is worth 3 point(s) and may result in restricted access until it expires. Serious infractions will never expire.

Original Post:
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showt...p?p=1061332751

Quote:

Originally Posted by damienduffy:
I have been informed that the analysis of the "Beat it" video ("What lies in plain sight") is considered "Hompophobic" and that posting it here is counter to forum rules.

This immediately raises the question of the limits to the type of discussion that can be held on this forum.

There was no incitement of negative action towards any group of people in the posted material, nor any suggestion that there was something to be hated about all people of a particular description.

What there was, was an in-depth analysis of how behaviour that is counter to traditional social norms has been secretly embedded into vastly popularised material in order to affect changes in thinking throughout the whole of society. THIS IS MEMETICS AT ITS BEST. THIS IS "MAJIK"!

THIS IS ONE OF THE BEST EXAMPLES OF HOW THEY CONTROL POPULAR THINKING.

But the content that is being embedded relates to a mode of behaviour that has been the subject of much controversy and it seems that discussion of anything that touches on this subject is to be considered "hate-speak" here.

Which causes me to wonder-

Should my recent posting of the book documenting the confirmed history of Jewish ritual murder be seen in the same light, according to the same logic? Even though it in no way accuses "all Jews"?

What about the information that exists relating to Israeli involvement in 911? Is that to be seen as "hate-speak" here?

Would we be able to discuss the role of Britain and the Vatican in the genocide of native North Americans? Would that be considered prejudiced against British people? Or is it okay to talk about that because it involves the "queen"?

What about what the Americans are doing in Afghanistan, can we talk about that?

I do not want to ever make prejudiced posts, but if I must avoid important issues due to political correctness then I would rather keep my mouth shut.




[End quote].

All the best,
David Icke's Official Forums

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

So the Icke forum operates in the same "boxed-in" way that Icke accuses the World of.

Just like Icke would say:

"You couldn't make it up".


This isn't about any negative view towards homosexuality, it's about the control of information available on thie forum and the complete stamping on any discussion of how the material that is allowed for discussion is filtered.

This is David Icke's forum operating according to the same controlled-knowledge principle that Icke apparently speaks out against. Which OBVIOUSLY means that NOBODY is going to learn the truth of the World from either David Icke or his website.

The deletion of my final post proves that they don't want this cat to get out of the bag.

My last post, titled "My last post it seems" was I thought carefully worded to not breach any rules or offend the administrators. It read:

I am compelled to stop posting here due to reasons that I am unable to disclose here.

I wish you all the best.

You can follow my news feed on Facebook~:

http://www.facebook.com/damien.duffy2

[End post)

Apparently that message was too hot for them to leave on the board!


"Crash physics for everyone" was allowed to be posted there recently. I sent this material to Icke in 2006 and he ignored it.

The article explains why the most basic physics principle show that the alleged explanations of aircraft crashing into buildings on 911 are completely impossible and this proof immediately implicates the media networks that broadcast fake and real-time-CGI "live" video.

The trolls on the forum threw their very best sticks at the idea, and this was a good thing, because the principles were easily defended and stand true.

Nobody has been able to refute "Crash physics for everyone" since it was written 7 years ago as an open challenge to Professor Steven Jones (who did not respond). Hopefully it will stay up on the david Icke forum. It is a 2-part thread:

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=235819

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=235916

David Icke presents as if he is exposing all of the lies in the World, when in fact what he really presents is a package of concepts, some of which are true indeed (but then often well-known also, e.g. Aspartame, Fluoride), some of which may be totally fictitious, and some of which are gross misrepresentation. The information that he leaves out is extremely important.

The largest gross misrepresentation of course, which is backed up by the "shape-shifting lizard" theory is that the current royal family is legitimate.

[The Royal line was broken after Henry II as revealed by Tony Robinson here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7DCasz6oeL4]

! The above is know understood to be a distraction, please read Greg Hallet's extremely informative comments below.

And then the de facto illegitimate line was broken [again], with de facto queen Victoria having had a (de facto) legitimate heir from a first marriage, one Marcos Manuel, the descendands of whome have made a current claim to the throne that is currently being ignored by Buckingham Palace and Downing Street.

The spooky goings-on at the David Icke forum started when I first posted this information about the current claim to the throne there and the thread went missing, then it re-appeared with a rubbish title that would not interest anybody. It seems to have gone again. You can learn all about it here:

http://www.theworldoftruth.net/HallettReport/No4.html#.USqlaFJADpc

Coffinman has never contributed on a forum where the sword of truth must be made to avoid valid targets as they present, and never will. To do so would be to give the false impression of a free discussion. The staff on David Icke website must have felt that this would have been apparent from my last post there and therefore deleted it.